The Ryzen v 4600H is AMD'due south new mainstream processor in their H-serial, designed for high operation productivity and gaming notebooks. There's no Ryzen three selection in the series, and so the Ryzen 5 4600H is actually the lowest tier APU offered here.

This is the chip AMD is selling for entry-level systems, and yet it's a compelling piece of silicon to be putting in budget devices: you get 6 Zen ii CPU cores and 12 threads, a base frequency of iii.0 GHz with boost up to 4.0 GHz, along with 8MB of L3 enshroud and a standard 45W TDP.

With AMD offering 8 cores in more expensive parts like the Ryzen 7 4800H (see the review), they can comfortably include half-dozen cores in mainstream laptops while maintaining nice production segmentation.

Yous besides receive all the benefits of AMD's 7nm Zen 2 compages, so that means a pregnant boost to efficiency over previous-gen parts, improved IPC and a refreshed GPU pattern. The Ryzen 5 4600H features an integrated Vega GPU with 6 compute units clocked upwardly to 1,500 MHz, only in exercise the vast bulk of systems using this APU volition also feature a detached GPU.

Direct contest comes from Intel's latest tenth generation, as well as older parts that are even so being offered. Intel offers Core i5 options for the entry-level market, however these are merely quad-core designs with average clock speeds. The Core i5-10300H for example, clocks up to four.5 GHz and packs 8MB of L3 cache within its 45W TDP.

This newer tenth-gen part isn't too unlike from the quad-cores that came before it. We get a small clock speed gain over the Core i5-9300H, which itself is a small clock speed proceeds on the Cadre i5-8300H. If we trace it back a few more generations, you'll find a similar design used for 2022's Core i7-6700HQ. With Intel stuck on 14nm this whole time, AMD is taking the opportunity to jump in and milk shake up the laptop market.

The laptop used for today'due south testing is the Asus TUF Gaming A15 that includes the Ryzen 5 4600H coupled with a GTX 1650 Ti GPU. This is a new entry-level GPU that unfortunately we don't have a ton of comparison information to use against right now for GPU-heavy benchmarks, but we'll piece of work through that over time.

This laptop looks very like to the TUF Gaming A15 that we used in our Ryzen 7 4800H review, however there are some subtle differences to the pattern both inside and out. Cooling components is a smaller unit that lacks an exhaust vent along the right side. The GPU is a lower power variant besides when compared to Ryzen vii models. Asus likewise ships this laptop with 8GB of single-channel retentiveness, leaving a free DIMM slot for hereafter upgrades. Nevertheless, this cripples out of the box performance considerably.

In other words, out of the box, this laptop is your average affordable entry, but to ensure an apples-to-apples comparison with other systems, we swapped out the retentiveness for a full 16GB of dual-aqueduct DDR4-3200. Lots of entry-level systems employ but a single DIMM which is a scrap frustrating, but a standard price saving method nonetheless.

As usual when nosotros run laptop benchmarks, the numbers you will encounter from other system specs are an average of results beyond several laptops with the same hardware configuration. We endeavour and test apples-to-apples every bit much as possible while as well removing bottlenecks, and all configurations are tested with default power settings unless otherwise specified. For both AMD and Intel CPUs that ordinarily ways a 45W long-term power limit.

Benchmarks

Let'due south kick this one off with a look at Cinebench R20 and… wait that can't exist right. The Ryzen 5 4600H is up near the superlative of the charts, not at the bottom similar y'all'd await from an entry-level APU. With a score over 3200 points, AMD's mainstream APU is outperforming much higher-tier processors from Intel like the Core i7-10875H and Cadre i9-9880H in the multi-core exam. This is impressive considering AMD's part packs just 6 cores, while Intel are offering 8. The superior efficiency of Zen two allows AMD to take a win hither by a double-digit margin over the 10875H, while featuring a core disadvantage.

The situation is even more impressive when pitting the 4600H up against the new Core i7-10750H in a core-for-core battle. AMD'due south part is 27% faster in terms of multi-threaded performance and equal for unmarried-thread, which is pretty great given these fries don't actually compete with i some other from a price perspective.

It's not as expert as Ryzen Mobile can arrive terms of efficiency, the Ryzen vii 4800H is some other 30 pct faster with the same power usage, the usual situation of clocking more cores at a lower frequency plays out nicely for Zen 2 as it does with Intel's CPUs.

The big kicker comes when nosotros actually put the Ryzen 5 4600H against the chip it'south competing with, the Cadre i5-9300H. At present I oasis't tested the new Core i5-10300H yet, just on paper information technology should be very like to the 9300H, maybe slightly faster. And in Cinebench R20, the Ryzen five 4600H absolutely obliterates the 9300H. It's twice every bit fast for multi-thread and around 8 per centum faster in unmarried-thread.

We meet like outstanding results when looking at Cinebench R15, with nearly 2x the performance of the Core i5-9300H as we just were talking nearly. Margins against Intel's other processors hold on equally well, with a 29% lead over the Core i7-10750H and a 21% atomic number 82 over Intel's older Core i7-9750H.

AMD isn't messing effectually with video encoding operation either. In Handbrake, the Ryzen 5 4600H delivers a crushing blow to the Cadre i5-9300H, coming in 65 percent faster. To put this margin in perspective, what the Core i5-9300H could encode in 68 minutes, the Ryzen five 4600H does in simply 41 minutes.

This puts the 4600H side by side to Intel's Core i7-10875H in terms of Handbrake performance, which is very impressive given the enormous price discrepancy betwixt 4600H laptops and 10875H laptops.

AMD continues to produce massive numbers in anything multi-threaded equally was the example in Blender. The 4600H is over twice every bit fast as Intel's Cadre i5-9300H, and more than thirty% faster than Intel's current six-core offering.

Ryzen also performs well for code compilation. For GCC compiling, the Ryzen 5 4600H is more 50% faster than the Core i5-9300H, while commanding substantial leads over Intel'south six-cadre products. This GCC compilation has multi and single threaded components merely unless we're fully single threaded, AMD appears to hold a double digit functioning proceeds.

The Ryzen 5 4600H also performs well for Chromium compilation using Google'due south recommended settings. It is ~57% faster than Intel's quad-core competitor, though the margins are a bit slimmer confronting six-core parts. The Ryzen five 4600H is still eight% faster than the Cadre i7-10750H and around xx% faster than the Core i7-9750H.

Moving into shorter term workloads, Microsoft Excel gets our offset expert await at how AMD fares confronting Intel with the same L3 enshroud size. Both the Ryzen 5 4600H and Core i5-9300H have 8MB of L3 cache, and nosotros come across AMD providing similar margins to other tests with a 45% functioning advantage. However every bit soon every bit you bound upwards to an Intel CPU with 16MB of cache, this heavy Excel workload swings back in favor of Intel even if by a slim margin. AMD is nearly able to offset the cache disadvantage with higher CPU core efficiency.

While this is representative of heavy Excel operation, in lighter productivity workloads every bit seen in PCMark's Productivity test, AMD holds a atomic number 82 thanks to college single-thread performance. We're seeing a ten% margin over the Core i5-9300H, along with around a 7% atomic number 82 on the Cadre i7-10750H and 9750H.

So for general PC usage for things similar web browsing and app loading, AMD also holds a minor margin here with their six-core H-series processor. At worst we're getting equivalent operation to a Core i7-10750H, which is a pretty great identify to be in.

vii-Zip is another workload that typically plays nice with AMD CPUs. The Ryzen 5 4600H is substantially faster than the Cadre i5-9300H in this test, and we do come across around a 20 to 25 percentage pb over Intel's vi-core CPUs in decompression also. Compression is another story, AMD easily beats the Cadre i5. but tin can't keep upward to those Core i7 offerings.

MATLAB R2020a is a widely used tool by engineers. Non only is the Ryzen 5 4600H a decent 28% faster than Intel's quad-core, it's also 7% faster than the Core i7-10750H.

The weakest event for Ryzen is with Adobe Acrobat PDF exporting. In this single-thread exam, the 4600H is marginally slower than the Core i5-9300H and that margin grows with Intel's higher-clocked parts similar the Core i7-10750H.

AMD remains the faster CPU choice for AES cryptography. This is a hardware accelerated role on modern processors and it appears AMD has the meliorate engine for this, pulling 30 percent ahead of Intel's competing laptop processors.

The following benchmarks are all compute workloads, so this means they include some course of GPU usage along with CPU usage. Given the system we have features a GeForce GTX 1650 Ti, we don't have any solid comparison data for this test run, but we figured nosotros'd include them anyhow just for reference. This will allow you gauge how this sort of system volition compare to some of the more expensive laptop options available in the market.

Adobe Photoshop is not a very GPU heavy application and is mostly dominated by CPU performance. The Ryzen 5 4600H performs well, matching the performance of the Core i7-9750H despite featuring a slower GPU. This configuration easily outperforms the Core i5-9300H when paired with a GTX 1660 TI besides, which bodes well for creators that do a lot of Photoshop on their laptop.

Next up we take Adobe Premiere. We're currently using the 14.2.0 Beta for testing, every bit it introduces hardware acceleration for Nvidia and AMD GPUs, and should be representative of performance moving forrad. In Puget's Export examination, again the Ryzen 5 4600H performs well considering information technology has a slower GPU.

And if you want to use a software encode, for example a 2 pass encode, the Ryzen v system punches well above its weight, slotting in betwixt Core i7-10875H and Core i7-10750H systems despite featuring but an entry-level GPU for effect acceleration.

The editing experience on Ryzen is solid, performing well in Puget'southward Alive Playback workload, matching Core i7 processors. And then for effects like Warp Stabilizer, Ryzen APUs as a whole sit a class to a higher place Intel offerings.

Our last productivity workload is DaVinci Resolve Studio and this is one where the GPU plays a significant part in encoding performance. Given the GTX 1650 Ti isn't the most powerful GPU going effectually, it falls towards the bottom of the charts. Information technology should be interesting to see how the 4600H fares when paired with something more powerful, like a GTX 1660 Ti or RTX 2060. For now this is the only laptop nosotros could find using the 4600H.

We likewise wanted to bear witness at to the lowest degree some form of gaming benchmark but the GTX 1650 Ti is easily outclassed by other GPUs in our database. Fifty-fifty in a game similar CS:Get at low settings, the criterion pass had some sections that were GPU express with this 50W detached card. And then for gaming performance we'll but have to wait for a proper comparing to come up forth because this GPU-limited environment isn't suitable. For gaming purposes, we'd expect most GTX 1650 Ti systems to perform similarly due to the GPU bottleneck; the CPU isn't much of a consideration.

Performance Breakdown

Allow'south nail through some performance comparisons earlier wrapping this upwards. The Ryzen 5 4600H is significantly faster than the Cadre i5-9300H in almost workloads, which we doubtable volition also be the example with the Core i5-10300. Multi-thread performance is up to twice as fast with the cadre count and efficiency advantage that AMD holds, but fifty-fifty with single-thread functioning nosotros saw better performance in almost instances. For frequent utilise cases similar decompression, cryptography, app loading, web browsing and light productivity, the 4600H was the faster CPU.

The Ryzen five 4600H is likewise by and large faster than the Core i7-10750H, a higher tier CPU from Intel that features the same six-core layout. In multi-thread workloads, the 4600H was 20 to 30 percent faster, and also fared better in some lighter thread count tests. However, with the 10750H clocking into the high four GHz range for outburst applications, too equally having corking single-thread performance and higher enshroud, the Core i7 CPU can take the performance crown in a few tests.

Similar story with the Core i7-9750H, although in areas where the Intel part wins, the margins are closer than we just saw. We call back it's safety to say that AMD is providing meliorate performance with the same core count with this generation of laptop CPUs.

The Ryzen 5 4600H holds its own confronting the 8-core Core i7-10875H in multi-cadre tests. In fact, the Ryzen 5 4600H can be up to x percent faster. However with superior single-thread performance and college clock speeds, there are also plenty of workloads where the Ryzen 5 4600H is not faster.

We've mentioned in the past how the Ryzen 7 3750H was not a very skilful laptop processor and this is shown quite conspicuously with the functioning gains AMD were able to reach moving to Zen ii. The Ryzen five 4600H decimates AMD'due south flagship from the previous-gen, sometimes getting a 100% operation uplift which almost sounds ridiculous.

As for how the Ryzen 5 4600H stacks upwardly to the Ryzen 7 4800H, information technology'south no surprise to meet the Ryzen 5 selection falling behind. By and large speaking, the 4600H is ~20 percent slower for multi-thread tasks and 4 to viii per centum slower for single-thread. What's impressive hither is that in the same 45W power envelope with the same boost characteristics, AMD are able to add in 33% more cores for around a thirty% performance increment going from 4600H to 4800H.

Higher core count parts are usually more than efficient in mobile course factors as they sit in a more favorable position on the voltage frequency curve, simply AMD is going to a higher place and beyond what is usually possible. This is probably a result of binning and simply using college quality silicon for the 8-core chips. And while the 4600H is in a lower bin, information technology still delivers much ameliorate functioning than other CPUs in its course.

Wrap Upward

Information technology's hard not to be impressed with what AMD is delivering this generation with Ryzen Mobile APUs. The Ryzen 7 4800H achieves a 30 to 40 percent multi-core operation pb over Intel's current high-end 8 core processors, and while that sets the right tone for Zen 2 on laptops, we recall the Ryzen 5 4600H is the near impressive of the bunch.

This six-core CPU offers a operation advantage over Intel's Core i5 quad-cores that is merely unheard of in the mobile space. Y'all don't encounter 2x performance leads within the same price class very ofttimes, permit lonely in power constrained laptop form factors.

Merely put, the Ryzen 5 4600H is punching well above its class, often matching or beating Intel's Cadre i7 processors, peculiarly the Cadre i7-10750H.

Simply put, the Ryzen 5 4600H is punching well to a higher place its class, oft matching or beating Intel's Core i7 processors, specially the Cadre i7-10750H. Intel may have been a chip blindsided by offering just a quad-core CPU in the Core i5-10300H. Granted, the Cadre i5 range isn't very popular with OEMs, but whether the Ryzen v 4600H is competing against the Core i5 range or a Core i7, AMD is still coming out on elevation in nigh productivity workloads.

Finally, how well the Ryzen 5 4600H fares in do is going to depend greatly on the organization it's integrated into. In budget systems that utilize it, the CPU won't exist a problem, but performance limitations might come up from the memory or GPU configurations, equally is the case with this Asus TUF organization that we guess will target the $900-950 price point.

The Ryzen 5 4600H is powerful enough that it throws upward interesting questions around laptop configurations. Well-nigh of the time, OEMs will offer Core i7 upgrades at anything above base models because Intel's quad-core is not that great. But in an entry to mid-range organization, is a Core i7 or even Ryzen 7 required? Could OEMs offer, say, a GTX 1660 Ti coupled with a Ryzen v 4600H for less coin than an equivalent laptop featuring a higher-tier CPU? That could finish upward being a fantastic balance in the upkeep space between toll, CPU and GPU operation.

Shopping Shortcuts
  • AMD Ryzen 7 4800H Laptops on Amazon
  • AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS Laptops on Amazon
  • Asus TUF Gaming A15 Laptop on Amazon
  • Nvidia RTX 2060 Max-Q Laptops on Amazon
  • Intel Core i7-10750H Laptops on Amazon
  • Cadre i7-9750H Laptops on Amazon
  • Intel Cadre i7-10875H Laptops on Amazon